![]() Your options for color balance correction, shadow/highlight management, clarity, sharpening and denoising are superior. You can sort of 'batch process' jpegs, applying the same settings to many files. You have available three versions: the original, the default ACR version (generally already much better) and your own edits. With a single DNG version, you only keep one file. ![]() Editing in ACR is vastly superior, quicker and simpler than using the array of the tools in the editor. But today, most users edit not only raw files, but the jpegs from their P&S or smartphones, the pictures they receive from the web. Of course, a jpeg is just that and does not offer all the raw advantages. Being able to use the same parametric and non destrctive workflow would be a significant bonus. You can't really imagine if you don't try yourself. They have to save as DNG and re-import, possibly stack the DNG with the original (Maybe a deliberate choice to push towards Lightroom). Today, most Elements users have jpegs to edit together with possible raw files.Īs you say, they can open the jpeg files in ACR from the editor, but they can't open in ACR from the organizer. Selecting a region changes the language and/or content on are also other ACR users, particularly Elements users.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |